Explore, enjoy and protect the planet Home    Legislation & Lobbying    Current Campaigns    Outings & Events    Get Involved    Donate    

Our forests need public input

St. Cloud Times, August 24, 2003 Sunday

By Andrea Karpe, Isanti

"Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not."

This message from the Lorax holds true even today. As the Sept. 11 deadline for public comments on the forest plans for our national forests approaches, the timber and paper companies are making their thoughts known loud and clear. But only we can speak for trees.

As the U.S. Forest Service struggles to devise a new set of Forest Management Plans, the timber industry has compiled a long list of complaints about the forest service's methodology and results.

According to the timber industry, the review and comment process is too long, complicated and unnecessary.

While the proposed forest plans are weighty - daunting at best - those pages are the only way we have to keep the government accountable. How can we know what is going on in the forests without this process and this documentation?

If we, the public, aren't aware of the actions affecting our national forests, we will never be able to protect them or enjoy them.

On the other hand, the only things the timber industry cares about are increased logging rates, increased tree sales and the elimination of prescribed burning for wildfire prevention.

Allowing these companies to control our national forests would be no different than letting Dr. Seuss's Once-ler chop down our trees as well.

It is in the best interest of the timber and paper industries to discourage the comment process and discredit the environmental research involved in managing the forest. How many citizens would agree with the policies of these industries - clear-cuts and unhampered logging?

... While these companies hide behind the reams of the environmental summary and use their size to intimidate the public, many groups, including the forest service, encourage people to get familiar with the plans and explore the alternatives.

Visiting the Sierra Club's Northstar Web site northstar.sierraclub.org/forests can give the public a very clear and balanced idea of what these forest management plans mean and what they will do to our cherished lands.

... The forest plans are overwhelming. However for the average citizen there are some suggestions to make them a little less daunting. First, don't read the whole plan. You wouldn't read the entire encyclopedia or the dictionary.

Read, study, learn and comment on the parts of the plan that are most interesting to you. Public comments are the sum of their parts. No one needs to feel obligated to comment on every single aspect of the forest plans.

Secondly, remember that specific comments give the forest service constructive thoughts they can use to adapt the current plans. More specific, detailed and better-researched comments will obviously carry more weight.

In the Superior and Chippewa national forests there is no Lorax working to protect the trees and the wildlife that live there. We must become him in order to protect our national heritage before it is too late.

Andrea Karpe is a Sierra Club Intern from Isanti.