Explore, enjoy and protect the planet Home    Legislation & Lobbying    Current Campaigns    Outings & Events    Get Involved    Donate    

Local Activists Rally to Send Message:
“Stop the Bush Administration forest policies, they leave no trees behind!”

La Crosse, WI – Sierra Club activists joined others today to air concerns about Bush administration forest policies. They gathered to tell the Bush administration--through visiting Under Secretary of Agriculture Mark Rey, a former timber industry lobbyist--that their proposed programs will destroy many of the remaining fragments of relatively untouched forest land.

“We’re here to tell the Bush administration that we disagree with their plan of ‘leave no tree behind,’” said Barb Frank, Sierra Club’s Midwest Regional Conservation Committee Chair. “There is a better way. We need the Bush administration to protect public forests not timber companies’ profits.”

Americans cherish their last pockets of wild in our National forests as places to hike, hunt and fish and as sources of clean water.

“These are the last wild forests left unprotected in the country, and they’re disappearing because of logging and development,” asked Joshua Davis, a Sierra Club organizer. “The Bush administration needs to protect these remaining precious bits of forest, not only because they exist on some of America’s premier headwaters areas and wildlife habitat, but also to preserve them for future generations to explore and enjoy.”

The Bush Administration is currently opening up millions of acres of wild, roadless forests to damaging logging, road building, and other development. In so doing, they have hallowed-out the landmark Roadless Area Conservation Rule, riddling it with loopholes that threaten the places Americans need and treasure for recreation, clean water and fish and wildlife habitat.

“The Bush administration’s ‘Leave No Tree behind Plan’ removes citizen participation, interferes with our judicial system, leaves old growth and roadless forests vulnerable, increases commercial logging, and will do little or nothing to reduce the threat of wildfire. In fact, it provides more help to timber companies than to fire-threatened communities,” concluded forestry activist Cory Rosene.